LABOUR BILL TO MODERNISE IRELAND’S HARASSMENT LAWS
Labour Justice Spokesperson, Brendan Howlin TD, has today published a Bill that aims to modernise Ireland’s existing harassment legislation to safeguard people against all forms of harassment, including stalking, cyber- bullying and so-called ‘revenge porn’.
The Harassment and Related Offences Bill 2017 follows recommendations made by the Law Reform Commission in its report on Harmful Communications and Digital Strategy, last year.
Deputy Howlin said:
“Ireland’s harassment laws haven’t been updated since the advent of the text message and as we all know, technology is moving at lightning speed. As the Law Reform Commission highlighted in its report last year, a number of gaps exist in the current legislation that require reform, which is what our Bill seeks to address.
“The measures we are proposing seek to bring Ireland’s regulations into the 21st century, by broadening the definition of communication to cover all electronic, written and spoken words. For example this would mean a threatening ‘iMessage’ sent on an Apple electronic device, or a Whatsapp or Facebook message, would be covered by law, which is currently not the case.
“Cyber-bullying has become a phenomenon of the modern age, with parents expressing deep concern about the vulnerability of their children to online harassment. Our Bill moves to address this by covering against the persistent communication about someone, as well as directly to that person. Minority groupings are more likely to be targeted – not because of anything they do, but because of who they are- and this Bill would also protect against online racial abuse.
“Sadly, women too are particularly targeted, and Labour’s Bill moves to protect against so-called ‘revenge porn’ by creating a new offence of distributing an intimate image without consent. This has proven effective in countries like the UK where such legislation already exists, with the British Crown Prosecution Service reporting more than 200 convictions across 2015/16.
“Importantly, the Bill makes it clear that it is not to be interpreted as altering the law so as to prohibit or unduly restrict the exercise of the rights of peaceable assembly or peaceful picketing, or any other constitutional right.
“Free speech should remain just that. But harassment, stalking, and aggravated online bullying are not expressions of freedom – they are attacks on it.”
NOTES TO EDITORS:
A) Labour’s Harrasment and Related Offences Bill 2017 can be found here:
B) Key features of the Labour Party’s Harassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Bill 2017:
The Bill adopts the broadest possible definition to mean the communication of information by any means, including –
· communication by spoken words, other audible means, behaviour, writing, sign or visible representation, and
· the communication of information that is generated, processed, transmitted, received, recorded, stored or displayed by electronic means or in electronic form.
The offence of harassment is currently found in the Non-Fatal Offences against the Person Act 1997. The new version provides that a person who, intentionally or recklessly and without lawful authority or reasonable excuse –
· persistently follows, watches, pesters or besets another person, or
· persistently communicates with another person, or
· persistently communicates with a third person about another person,
is guilty of harassment if those acts seriously interfere with the peace and privacy of the victim or cause alarm, distress or harm to the victim.
The punishment is a Class A fine or imprisonment for 12 months or, on conviction on indictment, to a fine or 7 years.
If the defendant’s acts both seriously interfered with the victim’s peace and privacy and caused the victim alarm, distress or harm, the court may take that into account as an aggravating factor.
If the defendant and the victim were in an intimate relationship and, in the course of or for the purposes of committing the offence –
· the defendant made use of personal information about the victim, or
· the defendant made use of an electronic device or software in order to monitor, observe, listen to or make a recording of the victim or his or her movements, activities and communications, without the victim’s knowledge and consent,
the court may take that fact into account as an aggravating factor.
4. Intimate images
The Bill creates a new of offence of distributing an intimate image without consent – what is commonly referred to as revenge porn.
A person who without lawful authority or reasonable excuse –
· takes, distributes or publishes, or threatens to do so, an intimate image of another person without consent, and
· by his or her acts seriously interferes with the peace and privacy of the other person or causes alarm, distress or harm,
is guilty of an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a Class A fine or to imprisonment for 6 months or both.
5. Prohibited messages
The Bill provides that a person who –
· with intent to cause alarm, distress or harm, or recklessly, or
distributes or publishes a threatening, false, indecent or obscene message to or about another person is guilty of an offence.
The offence is punishable on summary conviction by a Class A fine or imprisonment for 12 months or both and, on conviction on indictment by an unlimited fine or imprisonment for 7 years, or both.
This replaces section 13 of the Post Office (Amendment) Act 1951.
The Bill states that criminal proceedings against someone under the age of 17 may not be taken except by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions.
Privacy of victims
The Bill provides for the protection of the identity of victims, broadly modelled on reporting restrictions in the Criminal Law (Rape) Act 1981.
The Bill provides for civil restraint orders. The Circuit Court may order that a person shall not, for a specified period, communicate with or about a named person, or approach the place of residence or employment of a named person.
This is based on the comparable powers in the Non-Fatal Offences against the Person Act 1997.
Saver for constitutional rights
The Bill makes it clear that it is not to be interpreted as altering the law so as to prohibit or unduly restrict the exercise of the rights of peaceable assembly or peaceful picketing, or any other constitutional right.